But as recently as May 2017, O’Rourke broke with the majority of his Democratic House colleagues to vote for a bill that expanded the federal “list of statutory aggravating factors in death penalty determinations”to include the murder or “targeting” of a law enforcement officer, firefighter or other first responder.
In effect, the bill, called The Thin Blue Line Act, proposed making it easier to execute a defendant if they attacked law enforcement. The legislation is one of a series of billsRepublicanshave introduced as a political indictment of theBlack Lives Mattermovement, which has sought to end unjustified police killings of black people.
The measure passed the House with48 Democratic votes. Four Republicans voted against it.
The bill is far from becoming law. The Senate has not taken it up.
O’Rourke’s stance on the death penalty has evidently changed since 2017. In aninterview with Iowa Radioon Thursday, O’Rourke said he was morally opposed to the death penalty and would suspend its use at the federal level as president.
“It’s not an equitable, fair, just system right now ― the guarantees and safeguards against wrongful prosecution, the disproportionate number of people of color who comprise our criminal justice system,” O’Rourke said. “And on moral grounds, I oppose the death penalty.”
O’Rourke has endured scrutiny from someprogressivesfor his apparent shift toward more left-leaning economic views since his time on the El Paso City Council and over the course of three terms in the House.
But O’Rourke’s evolution on a matter like the death penalty is out of character. During his first House run in 2012, he challenged Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-Texas) from the left on criminal justice, arguing formarijuana legalization. He even entertained full-scale drug decriminalization as a way of de-escalating violence at the U.S.-Mexico border.
The O’Rourke presidential campaign did not respond to requests for an explanation of how or why his views on the death penalty evolved in the past two years.
Prominent national Democrats’ views on the death penalty have shiftedabruptly to the leftin recent years, reflecting growing efforts to expose inequities in the criminal justice system.
When California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D)announced a moratoriumon the death penalty in the Golden State on March 12, Sen.Kamala Harris(D-Calif.), whose presidential bid Newsom has endorsed,quickly heraldedthe decision.
Sen.Amy Klobuchar(D-Minn.), who like Harris, is a former prosecutor, opposes capital punishment, though she said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that she might consider it under extenuating circumstances, such as terrorism.
“I have talked about, when you have a terrorist, and it’s in a national security realm, looking at it differently,” Klobuchar said. “But overall, for the people that are in our jails right now, that are ― could be serving life without parole instead of the expense of having appeal after appeal after appeal, I would choose life without parole.”
Notice: Trying to get property of non-object in /home/anambrae/public_html/thefact/wp-content/themes/flex-mag/functions.php on line 982